|
|
|
GENUKI Contents |
One example of individual parishes or Unions recognising the need to balance the level of financial assistance with the wider economic situation was the Speenhamland System of 1795. This created a sliding scale for the amount of outdoor relief, which related to the price of grain. The system under the Old Poor Law created several problems:
The system of payment was seen to encourage the growth of the 'idle poor'. those who could work, but refused.
Employers often paid deliberately low wages knowing that the Union or parish would supplement the wage.
Expenditure on poor relief was spiralling out of control because it was related to rapidly increasing demand rather than supply.
A Royal Commission in 1832, on whose report the Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834 was based, addressed the problems of the Old Poor Law. The Commissioners found that the problem was not one of poverty, or shortage of money, but pauperism. This idleness and drunkenness posed a threat to the fabric of society. The Commission concluded that the most effective way to eradicate pauperism at minium cost was to make conditions in the workhouse deliberately worse than those of the 'independent labourer of the lowest class'. The recommendations were to be implemented by a national Commission. Poor Law Unions were to be created by grouping together parishes, and those Unions would be the responsibility of a Board of Guardians. The Guardians were then responsible for the administration of poor relief for the locality, rather than leaving it in the hands of individual parishes and townships.
The two Poor Law Unions of Wigan and Leigh covered the Wigan Metro area:
Abram, Ashton-in-Makerfield, Aspull, Billinge, Chapel End, Billinge Higher End, Blackrod, Dalton, Haigh, Hindley, Ince-in-Makerfield, Orrell, Parbold, Pemberton, Shevington, Standish-with-Langtree, Upholland, Wigan, Winstanley, Worthington, Wrightington.
The Union was subdivided into districts, each with a Relieving Officer and Collector; the records for Wigan, Standish and Hindley district officers survive. The Board of Guardians dissolved in 1929 and the workhouse premises in Frog Lane in Wigan was converted into a Welfare House.
Astley, Atherton, Bedford, Culcheth, Lowton, Pennington, Tyldesley with Shakerly, Westleigh.
There were workhouses in existence in Pennington, Culcheth, Tyldesley and Lowton, but a central workhouse at Atherleigh replaced these in the 1850s.
| Out-Relief Order Books | 1891 - 1897 | G/Wi/27 |
| Claims for Expenditure for the maintenance of lunatics | 1886 - 1891 | G/Wi/19 |
| Index to labour certificates for children | 1883 - 1888 | G/Wi/43 |
| Poll Books for election of Guardians | 1890 - 1892 | G/Wi/52 |
| Standish District Application and Report Books | 1875 - 1878 1881 - 1882 1902 | G/Wi/57b/134 |
| Standish District Outdoor Relief Lists (incomplete) | 1874 - 1902 | G/Wi/57b/136 |
| Wigan Outdoor Relief Lists | Sept 1894 | G/Wi/57c/136 |
| Hindley District Collector of the Guardians Receipt and Payment Book | 1892 - 1898 | G/Wi/57a/148 |
| Abram township Collector of the Guardians Receipt and Payment Book | 1848 - 1867 | G/Wi/57b/148 |
| Vaccinators' Register | 1899 - 1909 | G/Wi/155 |
| * Register of Inmates in the workhouse | 1906 - 1949 |
| * Asylum Reception Order | 1892 - 1940 | G/Lei/45 |
| * Removal Orders | 1898 - 1929 | G/Lei/48 |
* These records are closed for 75 years.
Find help, report problems, and contribute information.
[Last updated: Wednesday, 03Sep2008 11:35:28 BST - Phil Stringer]